Insuralex

  • The Group
    • About us
    • Current Management
    • Past Presidents
    • Membership inquiries
    • Regulatory Information
  • Experience and Vision
  • Services
  • Members
  • News + Articles
  • Reports
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ´s
Join

Can the failure to challenge a document in a proceeding be qualified as professional negligence?

by Insuralex / Thursday, 22 June 2023 / Published in Belzuz Abogados Spain, News + Articles

We will study whether the failure to challenge a document by the professional in charge of the lawsuit at the preliminary hearing may constitute professional negligence that must be compensated.

To do so, we will analyze the criterion maintained by the Barcelona Provincial Court in its ruling of 16.12.2020, which resolves an appeal.

The plaintiff filed a claim against his lawyer who was handling the application for the pensions to be paid by his spouse in accordance with the divorce decree.

Specifically, the lawyer did not contest a document submitted by the debtor to justify the payment, which resulted in the Court partially upholding the debtor’s opposition.

The plaintiff considered that this had resulted in the loss of the amount of 26,700 euros in maintenance payments as the enforceable claim was only partially upheld.

The judgment was appealed, and the Barcelona Provincial Court dismissed the appeal, considering that, although the lawyer’s conduct was inappropriate, it was not the cause of the damage suffered by the plaintiff.

Specifically, the Court considered that the fact of not having challenged the documents did not in itself constitute grounds for the lawyer to be sentenced for professional negligence and that, furthermore, the partial acceptance of the claim was based on the documents provided by the defendant, so that if they had been challenged, this would not have occurred.

The fact is that the accreditation of the damage due to loss of opportunity necessarily implies that the plaintiff has significant chances of success, and that, due to the negligent or erroneous conduct of the defendant professional, they lose them. In other words, the essence is to determine whether the chance of success was lost.

In such cases the judge must assess the likelihood of success if the party’s trial strategy had been properly presented or if the documents had been challenged, etc.

The Barcelona Provincial Court’s Judgment considers that the failure to challenge the documents was an error but does not see a causal link between the error and the plaintiff’s financial loss.

Finally, the Court considers that it was not the lawyer who had ceased to act as such in the proceedings who was responsible, but the lawyer who replaced her and did not argue the error in the assessment of these documents by the judge, which was the cause of the claimant’s dissatisfaction.

Conclusion

The mere commission of a procedural error does not necessarily imply that the professional involved is liable. In these cases, the court has the obligation to make a study of the causal link between the error and the possible results that can be produced with and without error.

It is necessary to prove the damage caused by the loss of opportunity, which is not without difficulty, since it is difficult to prove that a claim that has been wrongly presented cannot be accepted by the player.

Author: José Garzón García
Managing partner of the Insurance Law Department.
BELZUZ ABOGADOS SLP

Tagged under: Insuralex Spain, insurance claims Spain, Insurance Lawyers Spain, professional negligence Spain article

OUR SPONSORS

  • The Group
  • Experience and Vision
  • Services
  • Members
  • News + Articles
  • Reports
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ´s

Insuralex is not a law firm, does not practice law and does not provide legal advice or legal opinions. Insuralex members are not a partnership of law firms or lawyers and are not affiliated or in a relationship for the joint practice of law. Insuralex member firms are strictly independent firms.

Insuralex 2025    Cookie Policy | Conditions of use | Privacy Policy | FAQ's | Contact

TOP
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}